relation family
archetypal-identity
assigned, not verified What this family covers, what it fails to cover, and every relation string in the graph that lands in it. A family is assigned: two models read the definitions document and named the same kind of relation, or a person ruled where they did not. Verified is the other layer: a quote checked letter-exact against its paragraph and judged by a model of a different family. That was already done before any of this began.
Definition
The text asserts the two terms are ONE — via the projection thesis: a single archetype behind both terms (Edinger, Anatomy of the Psyche; the answer to the literal-absurdity objection). Includes scoped identity where a qualifier restricts the claim. Symmetric in principle;synonym-ofcarries theowl:SymmetricPropertyprecedent.
Boundary: the strongest family — demand the text's own identity assertion of the TERMS (see the indistinguishability rule above). Watch identity overreach, the E-series' recurring catch.
Relation strings that land here
is-identified-with 22is 21synonym-of 20identified-with 11is-identical-with 9amplified-by 6symbolizes 5identical-to 4is-a 4identifies-with 2is-analogue-of 2is-equated-with 2and 17 more, 18 relations between themseeds: the examples the definition names
- mercurius is-identical-with saturn 13 §274
- the-devil is-equivalent-to mercurius {scope: dark half} 14 §238
declared pairs
symbolizes / symbolized-by: inverse, transcribed from 1. symbolization (line 371)synonym-of: symmetric, transcribed from 4. archetypal-identity (line 415)
pending a ruling: items carrying a string this family covers
Checked against readers of Jung
Checked against 8 works of scholarship: across the sample, 8 of 16 treated items agreed with our family. This family: 0/3 agreed, 1/3 disagreed, 2/3 split, 2 not treated.the whole table
| family | agrees | disagrees | split | not treated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| archetypal-identity (incl. 26) | 0/3 | 1/3 | 2/3 | 2 |
| correspondence (incl. 27) | 2/3 | 1/3 | 0/3 | 2 |
| symbolization | 3/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 1 |
| doctrinal-attribution | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0/2 | 1 |
| amplification | 0/3 | 3/3 | 0/3 | 0 |
| controls (personif., union) | 2/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0 |
| All | 8/16 | 6/16 | 2/16 | 6 |
definition and seeds quoted from docs/FAMILY_DEFINITIONS.md v0.7.2;
external-validity row from docs/experiments/external_validity_2026-08/results.json (report v3, closed 2026-08-12);
built 2026-09-05
These families are this project's classification. They are calibrated inside this repository, checked once against outside scholarship on a small sample, and endorsed by nobody. What the layer records is how we sorted relations Jung wrote: a map of assertions, not a reading of him.