assigned, not verified What this family covers, what it fails to cover, and every relation string in the graph that lands in it. A family is assigned: two models read the definitions document and named the same kind of relation, or a person ruled where they did not. Verified is the other layer: a quote checked letter-exact against its paragraph and judged by a model of a different family. That was already done before any of this began.
72 assigned relations16 effective relation strings17 queued items carry a string this family covers0 declared pairs
graph-wide: 1669 assigned · 354 awaiting a ruling · 65 no family · 3 text undecided · 2091 relations
Definition
Quoted from docs/FAMILY_DEFINITIONS.md v0.7.2, family 7. The atlas quotes that document; it never paraphrases it.
Plain taxonomy: the subject is an instance or kind of the object.
Boundary: not identity (a member is not its class); not manifestation (an aspect is not a kind — the aspect strings moved out at v0.2); is-a is polysemous per the boundary rules.
Relation strings that land here
is-a29exemplifies11is9belongs-to4is-archetype-of3is-instance-of3acts-as2appears-as-archetype-of2is-regarded-as2exhibits1instantiates1is-a-three-dimensional1and 4 more, 4 relations between them
The number beside a string is how many relations carry it. 7 of these strings occur exactly once. The tail is the informative part: a string used once usually carried its own qualifier in the sentence it came from. A string can appear under more than one family, and does: assignment is made to an edge in its paragraph, never to a string in the abstract.
seeds: the examples the definition names
animus is-a psychopomp 9ii §33
the-self is-a archetype 9ii §257
the-self is-a god-image 9ii §42
pending a ruling: items carrying a string this family covers
The Self is-in-the-upanishads-the-personal-atman-and-also-the-suprapersonal Atman / Purusha CW 12 §137
arms-disagree
The Sea (mare) is-for-the-alchemists-their-own-darkness-namely The unconscious CW 13 §183
arms-disagree
Tree nymph is-in-the-patients-picture-an-eve-who-instead-of-being-taken-from-adams-side-has-come-into-existence-independently Eve CW 13 §327
arms-disagree
The Tree (mythological) is-in-mylius-dictum-itself Lapis philosophorum CW 13 §422
Anima exemplifies Contrasexuality (inversion of sex roles) CW 9i §58
arms-disagree
11 more. These are edges whose two model arms did not agree, or whose agreement the calibrated gate disputed. They carry a relation string this family covers, which is not the same as belonging here. The ruling has not been made, and the queue is not a backlog to be cleared by machine.
Checked against readers of Jung
Checked against 8 works of scholarship: across the sample, 8 of 16 treated items agreed with our family. The sample did not reach this family.the whole table
family
agrees
disagrees
split
not treated
archetypal-identity (incl. 26)
0/3
1/3
2/3
2
correspondence (incl. 27)
2/3
1/3
0/3
2
symbolization
3/3
0/3
0/3
1
doctrinal-attribution
1/2
1/2
0/2
1
amplification
0/3
3/3
0/3
0
controls (personif., union)
2/2
0/2
0/2
0
All
8/16
6/16
2/16
6
A row this small is the items themselves; no rate over a handful of items carries precision worth reporting. The check asked which kind of relation a reader of the literature would say Jung asserts, not whether Jung's claim is true, which the verification chain had already asked of the paragraph. The disagreements stand beside the agreements because hiding them would make the table an argument rather than a record. Full worksheets: docs/experiments/external_validity_2026-08/.
Agreement is not endorsement: no scholar reviewed this vocabulary, and the sample is small enough to name in a sentence.
receipts
counts read from seed.json sha256:9dc668bfff36 via web/family-map.mjs;
definition and seeds quoted from docs/FAMILY_DEFINITIONS.md v0.7.2;
external-validity row from docs/experiments/external_validity_2026-08/results.json (report v3, closed 2026-08-12);
built 2026-09-05
These families are this project's classification. They are calibrated inside this repository, checked once against outside scholarship on a small sample, and endorsed by nobody. What the layer records is how we sorted relations Jung wrote: a map of assertions, not a reading of him.