relation family

derivation

assigned, not verified What this family covers, what it fails to cover, and every relation string in the graph that lands in it. A family is assigned: two models read the definitions document and named the same kind of relation, or a person ruled where they did not. Verified is the other layer: a quote checked letter-exact against its paragraph and judged by a model of a different family. That was already done before any of this began.

30 assigned relations 25 effective relation strings 8 queued items carry a string this family covers 1 declared pair

graph-wide: 1669 assigned · 354 awaiting a ruling · 65 no family · 3 text undecided · 2091 relations

Definition

Quoted from docs/FAMILY_DEFINITIONS.md v0.7.2, family 14, added at v0.2 — review finding 13. The atlas quotes that document; it never paraphrases it.

Doctrinal, historical or textual transmission: one tradition, doctrine, text or figure draws from, descends from, influences or supplants another.

Boundary: generation begets beings; derivation transmits ideas and forms. The RELATION itself must assert transmission (draws from, descends from, influences, supplants, continues). Subject type is evidence, never a default — a tradition-subject edge whose relation asserts telos, privation, expression or opposition takes THAT family (alchemy reached-its-summit-in faust → telos; privatio-boni makes-evil-diminution-of good → privation; dogma expresses collective-unconscious → symbolization).

Relation strings that land here

derives-from 5draws-knowledge-from 2anticipates 1appropriated-in-particular 1based-on 1continues-doctrine-of 1derives-basic-ideas-from 1develops-on-basis-of 1differentiates 1draws-on 1follows-from 1has-a-source-in 1and 13 more, 13 relations between them

The number beside a string is how many relations carry it. 23 of these strings occur exactly once. The tail is the informative part: a string used once usually carried its own qualifier in the sentence it came from. A string can appear under more than one family, and does: assignment is made to an edge in its paragraph, never to a string in the abstract.

seeds: the examples the definition names

alchemy originates-in gnosticism 9ii §267
yahweh influenced jakob-boehme {scope: through the Cabala} 9ii §111
paracelsus draws-knowledge-from lumen-naturae 13 §148

declared pairs

produces / originates-in: inverse, restricted to the generation family, transcribed from 13. generation (line 559)

A declaration licenses a row in the other direction when the query panel's closure toggle is on, and nothing else. It is read at query time and never written into the graph.

pending a ruling: items carrying a string this family covers

Salt (Sal) derives-from The Sea (mare) CW 14 §245

arms-disagree

St. Augustine anticipates Archetype (archetype-as-such) CW 9i §5

arms-disagree

Plato anticipates Archetype (archetype-as-such) CW 9i §149

arms-disagree

Rebirth / Renovatio rests-on Archetype (archetype-as-such) CW 9i §207

arms-disagree

Archetypal image rests-on Archetype (archetype-as-such) CW 9i §708

arms-disagree

J. F. Herbart anticipates Splinter psyche / autonomous complex CW 8 §350

arms-disagree

2 more. These are edges whose two model arms did not agree, or whose agreement the calibrated gate disputed. They carry a relation string this family covers, which is not the same as belonging here. The ruling has not been made, and the queue is not a backlog to be cleared by machine.

Checked against readers of Jung

Checked against 8 works of scholarship: across the sample, 8 of 16 treated items agreed with our family. The sample did not reach this family.the whole table

family	agrees	disagrees	split	not treated
archetypal-identity (incl. 26)	0/3	1/3	2/3	2
correspondence (incl. 27)	2/3	1/3	0/3	2
symbolization	3/3	0/3	0/3	1
doctrinal-attribution	1/2	1/2	0/2	1
amplification	0/3	3/3	0/3	0
controls (personif., union)	2/2	0/2	0/2	0
All	8/16	6/16	2/16	6

A row this small is the items themselves; no rate over a handful of items carries precision worth reporting. The check asked which kind of relation a reader of the literature would say Jung asserts, not whether Jung's claim is true, which the verification chain had already asked of the paragraph. The disagreements stand beside the agreements because hiding them would make the table an argument rather than a record. Full worksheets: docs/experiments/external_validity_2026-08/.

Agreement is not endorsement: no scholar reviewed this vocabulary, and the sample is small enough to name in a sentence.

receipts counts read from seed.json sha256:9dc668bfff36 via web/family-map.mjs;
definition and seeds quoted from docs/FAMILY_DEFINITIONS.md v0.7.2;
external-validity row from docs/experiments/external_validity_2026-08/results.json (report v3, closed 2026-08-12);
built 2026-09-05

These families are this project's classification. They are calibrated inside this repository, checked once against outside scholarship on a small sample, and endorsed by nobody. What the layer records is how we sorted relations Jung wrote: a map of assertions, not a reading of him.