relation family
generation
assigned, not verified What this family covers, what it fails to cover, and every relation string in the graph that lands in it. A family is assigned: two models read the definitions document and named the same kind of relation, or a person ruled where they did not. Verified is the other layer: a quote checked letter-exact against its paragraph and judged by a model of a different family. That was already done before any of this began.
Definition
The subject brings forth or begets the object — psychological or mythological parenthood, the parent persisting beside the offspring.
Boundary: not transformation; not derivation (historical/doctrinal descent is family 14, split out at v0.2 — the same verb "originates" serves both, so read the terms: traditions derive, beings beget); kinship ROLES (brother, consort) are family 20.
Inverse pair declared: produces / originates-in (alongside produces/produced-by) — projection originates-in the-unconscious (9ii §17) and god-image originates-in psychoid (14 §787) are generation, inverse direction; only tradition-to-tradition originates-in (per §14's relation test) is derivation.
Relation strings that land here
produces 25arises-from 17originates-in 6derives-from 4begets 3generates 3arises-spontaneously-in 2child-of 2gives-birth-to 2originate-in 2begotten-from 1born-of 1and 25 more, 25 relations between themseeds: the examples the definition names
- four-elements give-rise-to will 9ii §100
- fish is-son-of great-mother 9ii §173
declared pairs
produces / produced-by: inverse, transcribed from Method and precedents — what is reused, what is rejected, and why (table row: OWL characteristics) (line 131)produces / originates-in: inverse, restricted to the generation family, transcribed from 13. generation (line 559)
pending a ruling: items carrying a string this family covers
Checked against readers of Jung
Checked against 8 works of scholarship: across the sample, 8 of 16 treated items agreed with our family. The sample did not reach this family.the whole table
| family | agrees | disagrees | split | not treated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| archetypal-identity (incl. 26) | 0/3 | 1/3 | 2/3 | 2 |
| correspondence (incl. 27) | 2/3 | 1/3 | 0/3 | 2 |
| symbolization | 3/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 1 |
| doctrinal-attribution | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0/2 | 1 |
| amplification | 0/3 | 3/3 | 0/3 | 0 |
| controls (personif., union) | 2/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0 |
| All | 8/16 | 6/16 | 2/16 | 6 |
definition and seeds quoted from docs/FAMILY_DEFINITIONS.md v0.7.2;
external-validity row from docs/experiments/external_validity_2026-08/results.json (report v3, closed 2026-08-12);
built 2026-09-05
These families are this project's classification. They are calibrated inside this repository, checked once against outside scholarship on a small sample, and endorsed by nobody. What the layer records is how we sorted relations Jung wrote: a map of assertions, not a reading of him.