relation family
manifestation
assigned, not verified What this family covers, what it fails to cover, and every relation string in the graph that lands in it. A family is assigned: two models read the definitions document and named the same kind of relation, or a person ruled where they did not. Verified is the other layer: a quote checked letter-exact against its paragraph and judged by a model of a different family. That was already done before any of this began.
Definition
The subject shows itself under the form of the object: one content, one appearing guise, the subject persisting and not exhausted by any guise. Directionality is the definiens: the SUBJECT is the less formulable term.
Boundary: inverts symbolization's direction test; not transformation (the subject persists — Mercurius manifests as lumen naturae, Proteus AND Regina); not generation (nothing new is brought forth); not personification (the guise need not be a person: sol manifests-as archeus).
Inverse pair declared: manifests-as / is-aspect-of (with is-manifestation-of) — the aspect strings run the SAME relation in the inverse direction (the subject is the partial showing, the object the content shown: lilith is-aspect-of adam), and the inverse declaration handles them without breaking the direction test. antichrist manifests enantiodromia is likewise inverse-direction and classified here.
Relation strings that land here
appears-as 21manifests-as 12manifests 6is-figured-as 4is-aspect-of 3amplified-by 2aspect-of 1embodies 1expresses-itself-in 1is-begotten-as 1is-dark-aspect-of 1is-embodiment-of 1and 9 more, 9 relations between themseeds: the examples the definition names
- mercurius manifests-as lumen-naturae
- syzygy manifests-as christ-and-church 9ii §41
- the-devil manifests-as antichrist
declared pairs
manifests-as / is-aspect-of: inverse, transcribed from 3. manifestation (line 393)manifests-as / aspect-of: inverse, transcribed from 3. manifestation (line 405)manifests-as / is-dark-aspect-of: inverse, transcribed from 3. manifestation (line 405)
pending a ruling: items carrying a string this family covers
Checked against readers of Jung
Checked against 8 works of scholarship: across the sample, 8 of 16 treated items agreed with our family. The sample did not reach this family.the whole table
| family | agrees | disagrees | split | not treated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| archetypal-identity (incl. 26) | 0/3 | 1/3 | 2/3 | 2 |
| correspondence (incl. 27) | 2/3 | 1/3 | 0/3 | 2 |
| symbolization | 3/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 1 |
| doctrinal-attribution | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0/2 | 1 |
| amplification | 0/3 | 3/3 | 0/3 | 0 |
| controls (personif., union) | 2/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0 |
| All | 8/16 | 6/16 | 2/16 | 6 |
definition and seeds quoted from docs/FAMILY_DEFINITIONS.md v0.7.2;
external-validity row from docs/experiments/external_validity_2026-08/results.json (report v3, closed 2026-08-12);
built 2026-09-05
These families are this project's classification. They are calibrated inside this repository, checked once against outside scholarship on a small sample, and endorsed by nobody. What the layer records is how we sorted relations Jung wrote: a map of assertions, not a reading of him.