relation family

personification

assigned, not verified What this family covers, what it fails to cover, and every relation string in the graph that lands in it. A family is assigned: two models read the definitions document and named the same kind of relation, or a person ruled where they did not. Verified is the other layer: a quote checked letter-exact against its paragraph and judged by a model of a different family. That was already done before any of this began.

40 assigned relations 7 effective relation strings 24 queued items carry a string this family covers 0 declared pairs

graph-wide: 1669 assigned · 354 awaiting a ruling · 65 no family · 3 text undecided · 2091 relations

Definition

Quoted from docs/FAMILY_DEFINITIONS.md v0.7.2, family 2. The atlas quotes that document; it never paraphrases it.

A figure gives personal, enacting form to a content — the subject (usually Figure-typed) is the content wearing a person, acting and speaking.

Boundary: not symbolization (a symbol presents; a personification acts); not identity (anima personifies the-unconscious does not exhaust the unconscious in the anima); not manifestation (the guise there need not be a person).

Relation strings that land here

personifies 32amplified-by 3embodies 1enacts 1is-a-personification-of 1is-personified-by 1personifies-plurality-of 1

The number beside a string is how many relations carry it. 5 of these strings occur exactly once. The tail is the informative part: a string used once usually carried its own qualifier in the sentence it came from. A string can appear under more than one family, and does: assignment is made to an edge in its paragraph, never to a string in the abstract.

seeds: the examples the definition names

anima personifies the-unconscious 9ii §26
maya personifies projection-making-factor 9ii §20
christ personifies the-unconscious 13 §448

pending a ruling: items carrying a string this family covers

Nigredo amplified-by The Shulamite CW 14 §592

arms-disagree

Coniunctio amplified-by Tifereth & Malchuth CW 14 §18

arms-disagree

Rebis / Hermaphrodite amplified-by Anthropos / Adam Kadmon CW 14 §652

arms-disagree

The shadow amplified-by Sol niger (black sun) CW 14 §172

arms-disagree

Sol amplified-by Gold (aurum) CW 14 §134

arms-disagree

Rex (the King) amplified-by Lion (leo) CW 14 §409

arms-disagree

18 more. These are edges whose two model arms did not agree, or whose agreement the calibrated gate disputed. They carry a relation string this family covers, which is not the same as belonging here. The ruling has not been made, and the queue is not a backlog to be cleared by machine.

Checked against readers of Jung

Checked against 8 works of scholarship: across the sample, 8 of 16 treated items agreed with our family. The sample did not reach this family.the whole table

family	agrees	disagrees	split	not treated
archetypal-identity (incl. 26)	0/3	1/3	2/3	2
correspondence (incl. 27)	2/3	1/3	0/3	2
symbolization	3/3	0/3	0/3	1
doctrinal-attribution	1/2	1/2	0/2	1
amplification	0/3	3/3	0/3	0
controls (personif., union)	2/2	0/2	0/2	0
All	8/16	6/16	2/16	6

A row this small is the items themselves; no rate over a handful of items carries precision worth reporting. The check asked which kind of relation a reader of the literature would say Jung asserts, not whether Jung's claim is true, which the verification chain had already asked of the paragraph. The disagreements stand beside the agreements because hiding them would make the table an argument rather than a record. Full worksheets: docs/experiments/external_validity_2026-08/.

Agreement is not endorsement: no scholar reviewed this vocabulary, and the sample is small enough to name in a sentence.

receipts counts read from seed.json sha256:9dc668bfff36 via web/family-map.mjs;
definition and seeds quoted from docs/FAMILY_DEFINITIONS.md v0.7.2;
external-validity row from docs/experiments/external_validity_2026-08/results.json (report v3, closed 2026-08-12);
built 2026-09-05

These families are this project's classification. They are calibrated inside this repository, checked once against outside scholarship on a small sample, and endorsed by nobody. What the layer records is how we sorted relations Jung wrote: a map of assertions, not a reading of him.