relation family

telos

assigned, not verified What this family covers, what it fails to cover, and every relation string in the graph that lands in it. A family is assigned: two models read the definitions document and named the same kind of relation, or a person ruled where they did not. Verified is the other layer: a quote checked letter-exact against its paragraph and judged by a model of a different family. That was already done before any of this began.

36 assigned relations 31 effective relation strings 12 queued items carry a string this family covers 3 declared pairs

graph-wide: 1669 assigned · 354 awaiting a ruling · 65 no family · 3 text undecided · 2091 relations

Definition

Quoted from docs/FAMILY_DEFINITIONS.md v0.7.2, family 17, added at v0.2 — review finding 12; widened at v0.3. The atlas quotes that document; it never paraphrases it.

Goal-direction AND goal-attainment: the subject aims at, strives toward, culminates in, reaches, or attains the object as its end. The teleology of the opus — one of the corpus's main axes.

Boundary: a goal is not the next term (sequence) and not a requirement (dependence). Against psychic-effect: telos claims an end pursued or reached BY the subject on its own arc; psychic-effect claims one term acting on the other. Attainment of one's own end is telos, not effect.

Relation strings that land here

aims-at 3attains 2culminates-in 2prepares-for 2achieves 1aimed-at 1aimed-to-include 1aims-to-produce 1aims-to-reproduce 1attempts 1destined-for 1ends-in 1and 19 more, 19 relations between them

The number beside a string is how many relations carry it. 27 of these strings occur exactly once. The tail is the informative part: a string used once usually carried its own qualifier in the sentence it came from. A string can appear under more than one family, and does: assignment is made to an edge in its paragraph, never to a string in the abstract.

seeds: the examples the definition names

self-knowledge aims-at the-self 9ii §252
the-self goal-of individuation 9i §278
lapis is-goal-of the-opus 14 §759

declared pairs

symbolizes / symbolized-by: inverse, transcribed from 1. symbolization (line 371)
produces / produced-by: inverse, transcribed from Method and precedents — what is reused, what is rejected, and why (table row: OWL characteristics) (line 131)
produces / originates-in: inverse, restricted to the generation family, transcribed from 13. generation (line 559)

A declaration licenses a row in the other direction when the query panel's closure toggle is on, and nothing else. It is read at query time and never written into the graph.

pending a ruling: items carrying a string this family covers

Homunculus symbolizes Uroboros CW 13 §111

gate-disputes-agreed

Lapis philosophorum symbolizes Christ (as symbol) CW 12 §451

arms-disagree

Lapis philosophorum symbolizes Anthropos / Adam Kadmon CW 12 §335

arms-disagree

Mandala symbolizes The Self CW 12 §247

calibration-flag (v0.7.1 run 1: calibrated gate reads the quote as archetypal-identity against the recorded symbolization; sentence-subject test contest)

Bitch (canicula / moon-dog) symbolizes The Hermetic Vessel (vas Hermetis) CW 14 §181

arms-disagree

Caelum (Dorn's heaven / quintessence) symbolizes God-image (imago Dei) CW 14 §705

arms-disagree

6 more. These are edges whose two model arms did not agree, or whose agreement the calibrated gate disputed. They carry a relation string this family covers, which is not the same as belonging here. The ruling has not been made, and the queue is not a backlog to be cleared by machine.

Checked against readers of Jung

Checked against 8 works of scholarship: across the sample, 8 of 16 treated items agreed with our family. The sample did not reach this family.the whole table

family	agrees	disagrees	split	not treated
archetypal-identity (incl. 26)	0/3	1/3	2/3	2
correspondence (incl. 27)	2/3	1/3	0/3	2
symbolization	3/3	0/3	0/3	1
doctrinal-attribution	1/2	1/2	0/2	1
amplification	0/3	3/3	0/3	0
controls (personif., union)	2/2	0/2	0/2	0
All	8/16	6/16	2/16	6

A row this small is the items themselves; no rate over a handful of items carries precision worth reporting. The check asked which kind of relation a reader of the literature would say Jung asserts, not whether Jung's claim is true, which the verification chain had already asked of the paragraph. The disagreements stand beside the agreements because hiding them would make the table an argument rather than a record. Full worksheets: docs/experiments/external_validity_2026-08/.

Agreement is not endorsement: no scholar reviewed this vocabulary, and the sample is small enough to name in a sentence.

receipts counts read from seed.json sha256:9dc668bfff36 via web/family-map.mjs;
definition and seeds quoted from docs/FAMILY_DEFINITIONS.md v0.7.2;
external-validity row from docs/experiments/external_validity_2026-08/results.json (report v3, closed 2026-08-12);
built 2026-09-05

These families are this project's classification. They are calibrated inside this repository, checked once against outside scholarship on a small sample, and endorsed by nobody. What the layer records is how we sorted relations Jung wrote: a map of assertions, not a reading of him.